Will a Cocaine Vaccine Keep Addicts from Using? | The Fix
facebook twitter RSS
HOT TOPICS: Alcoholism  Addiction  AA  Cocaine  Heroin

Will a Cocaine Vaccine Keep Addicts from Using?

Human testing to begin for a new vaccine designed to trigger the immune system to create antibodies against cocaine

Image: 

It's on the way? Shutterstock

By John Lavitt

01/03/14

| Share

Imagine that cocaine addiction could be eradicated, poof, with a simple vaccine. At Weill Cornell Medical College, Dr. Ronald G. Crystal, who for years has been working on just such a vaccine, now thinks his team has actually figured out a very clever trick to make that dream a reality.

“The vaccine eats up the cocaine in the blood like a little Pac-Man before it can reach the brain,” is his pop description of the biology weapon he has fashioned and is about to begin using in human tests after highly successful results with lab animals.

Clearly, any anti-cocaine vaccine that could hold up under further tough testing would permanently alter the landscape of illegal drug abuse in America and might open the door to vaccines for other drugs. According to The National Institute on Drug Abuse, more than 1.9 million Americans used cocaine in 2009, with more than a million of those classified as cocaine abusers. If Crystal’s new cocaine vaccine is proven effective, the impact of reducing that number by even five percent would be impressive.

But that is a very big doing and requires a number of “big if” hurdle-climbs.

Scientifically, cocaine is a tiny molecule, a crystalline tropane alkaloid, obtained from the leaves of the South American coca plant. When imbibed, the molecules cross over into the brain and bind to the dopamine transporter, effectively blocking the ferrying of dopamine out of the synapses. Dopamine is the "pleasure" neurotransmitter in the brain. Trapped in the synapses, the result is a massive flooding of the pleasure centers. In short, you get high.

Crystal’s anti-cocaine vaccine combines bits of the common cold virus with (and here is the trick) a particle that mimics the structure of cocaine. When the vaccine is injected, the body "sees" the cold virus and mounts an immune response against both the virus and the cocaine mimic that is hooked to it. Essentially, the immune system is fooled into generating antibodies that will then be activated once real cocaine is imbibed.

“Once immune cells are educated to regard cocaine as the enemy, they produce antibodies against cocaine the moment the drug enters the body," Crystal says.

In Crystal’s animal studies, when the mimic antibodies were extracted and put into test tubes containing cocaine, the antibodies attached themselves to the cocaine molecules and literally gobbled up the cocaine. This caused the cocaine molecules to increase in size to the point where they could not cross over the blood-brain barrier.

In the second stage of Crystal’s research, only 20% of the cocaine was able to cross over the blood-brain barrier and hook onto the dopamine transporters of the vaccinated primates. Moreover, at 20% there were almost no intoxicating effects on the animal subjects. Such a massive drop is the reason why Crystal and his team believe the anti-cocaine vaccine will work in human beings.

"This is a direct demonstration in a large animal…that we can reduce the amount of cocaine that reaches the brain sufficiently so that it is below the threshold by which you get the high,” Crystal told The Fix.

Crystal’s supposition about cocaine’s specific effect on the brain builds on some previous human research. Dr. Nora Volkow, the Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, used a brain imaging technology called positron emission tomography (PET) to study the brains of long-term cocaine users. Like Crystal, she noted that the intensity of a cocaine-induced high was connected directly to cocaine’s ability to block the dopamine transporter system.

Using intravenous injections of cocaine at typical doses, Volkow found that cocaine blocked between 60% and 77% of the dopamine transporter binding sites in the coke-users' brains. She also discovered that the threshold at which the volunteers said they were experiencing a drug-induced high occurs when at least 47% of the binding sites are blocked by the cocaine.

Knowing this, any vaccine that would diminish cocaine’s access into the brain and potentially thereby seriously alter addictive behavior would be major progress in human immunology, with wider positive implications for drug treatment.

AND THEN THERE ARE THE OBSTACLES

One big one is the addicts themselves and the reality that drug abusers will do anything to chase their high. Hence a vaccine, even one that works perfectly, might not attract many addicts - and those that do try it, might bolt fairly quickly.

Can patients with a notable history of drug abuse be reliable?

Drug addiction treatment amounts to $180 billion in healthcare costs every year in the U.S. Cocaine and crack kill more Americans every year than car accidents. Despite the increased focus on recovery in the past decade, the relapse rate within the first year for cocaine addicts is 55%, 85% for crack addicts.

The track record to date of other research efforts with cocaine is meaningful here.

In 2010, an earlier study by Dr. Thomas Kosten of the Baylor College of Medicine, collapsed largely due to addict behavior.

Kosten, currently the co-director of the Dan Duncan Institute for Clinical and Translational Research at the Baylor College of Medicine, noted in an exchange with The Fix that, “Our cocaine-abusing patients had a tendency to try to override any blockade that we set up using these antibodies.”

One of the problems with Kosten’s study derived from his choice to work with heroin addicts being treated with methadone – an indication that their hunger for cocaine had been full-blown. Even with Kosten’s vaccine in their systems, many of the addicts in his tests compulsively chased the high.

The Baylor trials had 115 addicted participants. Surprisingly, only 38% produced enough antibodies to dull the effects of cocaine. Among the high-antibodies group, only 53% stayed free of cocaine 50% of the time.

“Immunization did not achieve complete abstinence from cocaine use,” Kosten admitted at the time of the study.

Did the methadone affect the performance of the vaccine? By choosing such a patient population, was Dr. Kosten’s study even feasible?

Disturbing to researchers is what happened to the “successful” study participants. Cocaine levels in the bodies of many participants were found to be elevated. Many had as much as ten times the amount of cocaine in their bloodstream than expected. Although nobody overdosed and died, such an outcome was a real possibility.

The extremely high abuse levels revealed an obvious attempt by test subjects to get high no matter what the cost. Some participants even complained of financial troubles caused by their compulsion. In an attempt to beat the vaccine, cheating addicts spent as much money as they could muster on cocaine. Rather than foster recovery, the vaccine seemed to trigger extreme addictive behavior.

Will Kosten’s troubles repeat in Crystal’s new human trials even without using methadone patients as a test base?

Kosten told The Fix that he would advise Crystal to take a different approach in his human trials: use “patients who have already attained several weeks of abstinence rather than using patients who need to become abstinent.” Crystal has refused to comment on any specifics in regards to his upcoming human trials beyond what is stated in his press release.

Beyond that, as Kosten notes, is the simple scientific fact that very high antibody levels must be produced in the patients in order for the vaccine to work. Even if such a high volume is produced, the antibodies need to have what Kosten describes as “a reasonably high affinity for cocaine in order to be effective.”

In Crystal’s first trials with mice, as he reported in his description of the earlier phases, “The vaccine effect was found to last for a minimum of 13 weeks, all the while effectively arming the mice with an immunity to cocaine's effects when consumed in amounts equivalent to those humans might ingest.”

In the second stage tests, a version of the new vaccine lasted for seven weeks in non-human primates.

It is uncertain how long the vaccine will continue to work in people. Arming mice against cocaine abuse and addiction is one thing. Arming willful, emotionally needy human beings is an entirely different proposition. In the Cornell press release, Crystal allowed for some of the challenges:

“An anti-cocaine vaccination will require booster shots in humans, but we don't know yet how often these booster shots will be needed . . . I believe that for those people who desperately want to break their addiction, a series of vaccinations will help.”

Kosten suggested that if Crystal’s initial human trials prove to be considerably less effective in these crucial regards than in animals, then “the vaccine may need to be coupled with an enhancement of the enzyme that breaks down cocaine in the blood - pseudocholinesterase. These high-efficacy enzymes are being developed by several groups including TEVA, a large pharmaceutical company, and have begun human studies.”

“I hope that he can succeed with a better antibody response than I was able to attain with my much more primitive vaccine using a cholera toxin carrier,” Kosten said. “I think that this idea of a long-acting vaccine blocker is fundamentally sound.”

Treatment professionals offer a qualifier: When asked if he thought an anti-cocaine vaccine would be helpful in his therapeutic work with drug addicts, Stephen Dansiger, an addictions and trauma therapist in Beverly Hills, told The Fix: “A cocaine vaccine could be a good first step in breaking the physical cycle of addiction, but I believe it will require other interventions that address the underlying causes and conditions.”

Many agree.

KEITH RICHARDS WEIGHS IN

A significant factor in all the research is that street cocaine is not given to test subjects. The far more powerful pharmaceutical cocaine is. Notable primarily as an anesthetic for eye and nose surgical procedures, its use raises the question of whether it triggers the addictive cycle and whether it engenders a stronger effect on test subjects.

One impeccable source on the subject is Keith Richards. In his autobiography, Life, the Rolling Stoner recalled going on tour “fueled by Merck cocaine… Pharmaceutical cocaine cannot be compared in any way to cocaine produced in Central or South America. It is pure… There are absolutely no withdrawal symptoms.”

Other medical solutions developed to address addiction also provide a clue as to what might be the fate of a cocaine vaccine that passes its human trials. Antabuse, the popular brand name for Disulfiram, is an alcohol antagonist drug that delivers an allergic reaction to alcohol. Although not a vaccine, Antabuse was designed as a preventive measure to aid in the beginning of sobriety; it has not proven to be a reliable source of long-term sobriety without the additional support of counseling.

Closer to the idea of the anti-cocaine vaccine are the opiate blockers—or antagonists—currently in use like Suboxone and Naltrexone. Suboxone prevents opiate drugs such as heroin from activating the dopamine receptors in the brain. Naltrexone is a receptor antagonist that binds to the opiate receptors and prevents the opiate-triggered endorphin response. 

In practice, both drugs have had limited success given that drug addicts are not willing to maintain an ongoing program that prevents them from getting high.

Rather than address these challenges in questions posed to him by The Fix, Crystal said he would defer specific comment until human trials are completed. His only response: “We believe this strategy is a win-win for . . . the estimated 1.4 million cocaine users in the United States [and especially for those] who are committed to breaking their addiction to the drug. . . Even if a person who receives the anti-cocaine falls off the wagon, cocaine will have no effect.”

Even so, these unaddressed-by-Crystal factors become more significant if there is reasonable success in his human trials. The kicker here is money. For good reason – poor test results - Kosten was frustrated in raising funds needed to continue his testing. No pharmaceutical company would sponsor his research. In Crystal’s case, companies can be expected to be highly cautious given the history of addict attempts to increase their dosages to overcome any vaccine.

What would happen if reporters uncovered the fact that even when inoculated, Crystal’s vaccine users were still using cocaine, only now in increased quantities? The resulting field day for the media is something drug companies are certain to take into consideration.

Kosten adds to these concerns his own belief that the pharmaceutical industry lacks a focus on preventative medicine. Given the cost-benefits ratio, he argues, there is a general lack of Big Pharma interest in supporting the development of new vaccines. While maintenance drugs like methadone promise long-term repeat usage, vaccines tend to be “one-and-done” treatments that are relatively inexpensive.

A recent Forbes article about Microsoft’s Bill Gates' multi-billion dollar and successful philanthropic endeavor to get vaccines created and marketed to deal with the major diseases in the world, reported that it took a vast Gates global organizing effort creating a mass market for the pharma companies, plus many billions of his research seed funding, to get pharma to develop vaccines. Gates was quoted as saying, “If you 15 years ago had said, ‘How important are vaccines to these various businesses?’ They would have said, ‘You know, our drug businesses are going to do so well. And vaccines are so tough, particularly because of liability issues.’”

The past decade has not radically altered this basic stance of Big Pharma for any vaccine development which Gates is not backing. And the liability issues that saddle the future of Crystal’s new vaccine are more than obvious. Why would a pharmaceutical company take the risk?

Bottom line: even with the support of a pharmaceutical company, the outlook for Crystal’s vaccine study is mixed at best.

And yet, let us all cheer him on and wish that each hurdle is surmounted. Even a 5% improvement would be a blessing. Who knows, perhaps Gates will one day turn his philanthropic attention to drug addiction.

John Lavitt is a regular contributor to The Fix. He last wrote about The FDA’s approval of the painkiller Zohydro.

Rehabilitation Directories

Most Popular
Sober Living
Hey You!

“Listen,” you tell the cop. “I know I passed the fucking test, and you know I passed the fucking test, so can I get back into my truck and drive home now?”

the fix tv