Shrinks May Make Internet Addiction Official

Shrinks May Make Internet Addiction Official

By Valerie Tejeda 02/13/12

But the proposed introduction of "new" mental illnesses to the DSM psychiatrists' bible is highly controversial.

Image: 
internet-addict-fix.jpg
Would going official help or hinder internet
"addicts"?
Photo via

The DSM—AKA the Diagnostic Manual of Mental Disorders, or the Psychiatric Bibleis considering adding internet addiction to its defining list of mental illnesses. The new edition, the DSM-5, is scheduled to be published next year and is keenly awaited by mental health professionals. Besides (possibly) internet addiction, it will also include "disorders" such as “oppositional defiant disorder” and “apathy syndrome”: both behaviors that many believe to be normal. The American Psychiatric Association (APA), which publishes the manual, has attracted criticism for the proposed inclusion of internet addiction from those who worry about the effect of labeling millions more people as mentally ill, possibly leading to the unnecessary prescribing of psychiatric drugs. "Many people who are shy, bereaved, eccentric, or have unconventional romantic lives will suddenly find themselves labeled as mentally ill," says Peter Kinderman, head of Liverpool University's Institute of Psychology. "It's not humane, it's not scientific, and it won't help decide what help a person needs." Over 11,000 health professionals have signed an online petition online condemning the proposed changes to the manual.

Please read our comment policy. - The Fix
Disqus comments
valerie tejeda.jpg

Entertainment journalist and author Valerie Tejeda spends her days reporting on books, television, and all things pertaining to pop culture, and spends her nights writing novels for teens. Her stories have appeared on a variety of different publications, including but not limited to: VanityFair, MTV, The Huffington Post, TeenVogue, She Knows, Latina, The Fix, Salon.com, Cosmopolitan, and more. You can find Valerie on Linkedin and Twitter.

Disqus comments