Drug Addicted Mother to Get Compensation For Disabled Daughter's Death

Will My Insurance Pay for Rehab?

Sponsored Legal Stuff - This is an advertisement for Service Industries, Inc., part of a network of commonly owned substance abuse treatment service providers. Responding to this ad will connect you to one of Service Industries, Inc.’s representatives to discuss your insurance benefits and options for obtaining treatment at one of its affiliated facilities only. Service Industries, Inc. Service Industries, Inc. is unable to discuss the insurance benefits or options that may be available at any unaffiliated treatment center or business. If this advertisement appears on the same web page as a review of any particular treatment center or business, the contact information (including phone number) for that particular treatment center or business may be found at the bottom of the review.

Drug Addicted Mother to Get Compensation For Disabled Daughter's Death

By McCarton Ackerman 08/14/14

A mother's absence due to drug addiction led to her disabled daughter's brutal beating at the hands of her husband.

Image: 
child abuse help.jpg
Shutterstock

The current hot topic in New South Wales, Australia, is over a drug-addicted mother receiving victim’s compensation for her disabled daughter’s pending death, despite her absence resulting in the child being brutally beaten at the age of seven by the woman’s then-husband.

The woman, who can’t be named for legal reasons, has been awarded half of the $50,000 in victim's compensation paid to the child after the violent attack. She will be able to collect the money when the girl, now 13, passes away. She is reportedly “on the brink of death,” as her congenital condition has dramatically worsened, despite requiring life-saving surgery at the time of her severe beating. She has been left with no skull over the left side of her brain and has to wear a rigid head covering at all times.

The child was placed in foster care after the attack and her current foster parents will receive the other half of the money. The Department of Family and Community Services wanted to split money between the foster parents and two children’s hospitals that treated the girl for five months after the assault. They argued that the woman had an extended history of drug abuse and neglectful parenting, which was partially responsible for the child’s assault. She has also reportedly had minimal contact with her daughter over the last two years. She was entitled to weekly supervised visits with her daughter, but stopped using them in December 2011.

However, the NSW Supreme Court ruled last week that the hospitals were entitled to nothing. "Whatever her failings, [the mother] was not beyond the pity of a child such as [the daughter], with whom there was a family bond and a shared life of tragedy," noted Justice Geoff Lindsay. He also believed that the girl would not have left her mother out of the will if she had the capacity to make one.

The woman’s then-husband was convicted in September 2011 of assault occasioning grievous bodily harm.

Please read our comment policy. - The Fix
Disqus comments
Disqus comments