Big Tobacco Fights Feds Over Cigarette Pack Corpses

Will My Insurance Pay for Rehab?

Sponsored Legal Stuff - This is an advertisement for Service Industries, Inc., part of a network of commonly owned substance abuse treatment service providers. Responding to this ad will connect you to one of Service Industries, Inc.’s representatives to discuss your insurance benefits and options for obtaining treatment at one of its affiliated facilities only. Service Industries, Inc. Service Industries, Inc. is unable to discuss the insurance benefits or options that may be available at any unaffiliated treatment center or business. If this advertisement appears on the same web page as a review of any particular treatment center or business, the contact information (including phone number) for that particular treatment center or business may be found at the bottom of the review.

Big Tobacco Fights Feds Over Cigarette Pack Corpses

By Tony O'Neill 08/17/11

Tobacco giants say a law placing graphic images on all US cigarette packets, slated for October, will happen over their dead bodies.

Image: 
ART_cigarettecorpse.jpg
Taken too far? Photo via

Smokers feeling persecuted in these post-smoking ban days may soon suffer further at the hands of our health-conscious leaders: Federally-mandated labels featuring graphic images, including smoke billowing from a hole in someone's throat; rotting, diseased gums; and a full-color, roughly sewn-up, post-autopsy corpse. The images, reminiscent of the Faces of Death movies, will occupy the top half of the front and back of every cigarette pack sold in the US, along with death-predicting slogans. The law will take effect in October—unless tobacco companies get their way. Four of them—including giants Lorillard and R.J. Reynolds—are suing the government. They claim it's an unconstitutional way to spread an anti-smoking message: “The notion that the government can require those who manufacture a lawful product to emblazon half of its package with pictures and words admittedly drafted to persuade the public not to purchase that product cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny,” argues Lorillard attorney Floyd Abrams. It’s too early to say how this will end, but last year a Kentucky federal judge named Joseph McKinley Jr. largely rejected the industry’s free-speech challenge to federal law. Government officials say the US will have 213,000 fewer smokers one year after the law's introduction. And Justice Department attorney Alisa B. Klein wrote that restrictions are needed, as tobacco companies’ imagery "...seeks to distract potential users from the fact that tobacco products are lethal and addictive, and to suggest that tobacco is a harmless indulgence akin to designer clothing and perfume." But you don't need to be a fan of Big Tobacco to dislike the ghastly, full-color surgery pictures that the New York Health Department recently plastered on what seems like every bus stop and subway car in the city.

Please read our comment policy. - The Fix
Disqus comments
Disqus comments